Obviously we disagree. I see nothing wrong with looking at a woman who is dressed nicely. Ogling is definitely out, as I said before. If a woman is dressed like streetwalker, she will likely get the leers. It does not of course give anyone the right to push unwelcome advances. Racy attire will, however, engender undue attention and probably unwelcome advances. The man must, attire aside, back off if rejected.
If you see something wrong with that, I don't know what to tell you.
I recall being in Stratford-upon-Avon in 2000 and saw three young ladies walking across a small bridge. I was talking with the rest of the group when all three whipped their tops up and bared their breasts. So, is anyone who looked at them a pig for having done so? What would a reasonable person expect? If I the guys I was with are fucked up for looking (I actually missed it), then the girls are fucked up for flashing.
So if a woman is wearing attire that leaves little to the imagination, why is she wearing it? For attention, to be admired and noticed? If someone notices, they are fucked up? That's pretty fucked up.
I don't know what you think my views of gender are, but I'd say your subjective handling of what you think they are would be quite fucked up, with all due consideration.
Right. One other thing: If you are extrapolating from what Ant said and applying it to me - that is fucked up. I never indicated in any way that a woman provacatively dressed deserves to be raped, touched, harrassed; nor did I say that leering at a woman so dressed is appropriate either. Billboards are designed so as to grab attention. Actually, my mother would even take you to task on inappropriate dress by a female.
It isn't anything goes by either side, mate. That is equality.
EDITED: 23 Apr 2015 18:15 by FIXRMAN