Codingx-posted from stack overflow

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  [The best version of] (DSMITHHFX)      
42257.12 In reply to 42257.9 
> Explanations are sparse

I prefer the term concise - no need to dredge through unnecessary waffle to figure out what something does.


> useful examples rare

Possibly. On most sites I tend towards going straight to the examples because the explanations are waffle, but don't need to with MDN.


> there's an assumption of underlying familiarity

That'll be because it's mostly a reference.

There is a JavaScript Guide which appears very comprehensive, but looking at a few pages it does a horrific job of explaining stuff and has some terrible examples, so, yeah... that sucks. :/

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–12

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2018 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats