War & Politicsgun control

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  JonCooper   
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.2 In reply to 39888.1 
I was just thinking about the recent case where no charges are to be made against the couple who shot burglars on their farm.

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Matt  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.3 In reply to 39888.1 
I voted other.

Althought I definitely wouldn't immediatly go out and buy a gun, having never been in a situation where other people have (repeatedly or otherwise) threatened me by burgling my home, and increasing my anxiety and stress and making me more likely to make rash decisions, I don't know what I might do.

I'd like to think I wouldn't, but when pushed to the edge I really don't know.

doohicky

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  graphitone  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.4 In reply to 39888.2 
I went for 'I would consider it, but probably no'. Only considering it as far as that it's been documented that people have had intruders and been able to use a gun to defend themselves, but like Matt, I wouldn't go out and buy one just because it's legal to do so. Spades, chainsaws, axes and nailguns etc are all legal to buy and would prove just as an effective weapon when dealing with intruders, and though I own a few I don't feel it necessary to keep one by my bedside. Wonder if the couple who shot the burglars would have got off if they'd taken a nail gun to the intruders? :/
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  graphitone     
39888.5 In reply to 39888.4 
A lot more people (and members of their families) are killed by their own guns, than are killed in the act of burglary by gun-wielding citizens. Guns (especially handguns) are extremely, wildly dangerous to have around.

----
"You have unknowingly complimented the author: telling a journalist they should be a novelist is like telling a stripper they should be a ballerina. "
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Dan (HERMAND)  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.6 In reply to 39888.2 

Hard to say definitely yes , but I'd certainly consider the option.

 

That said, I do hope it doesn't become an option.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper   
 To:  Dan (HERMAND)     
39888.7 In reply to 39888.6 
I'm the same, would consider it

I don't think it will become an option, the Gov wouldn't want to arm the people it spends a lot of time pissing off

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  craig (CHARTLEY)  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.8 In reply to 39888.1 
I can't see me needing one for home protection. I'd be strongly tempted for work. A taser would be spot on to be fair, just something other than a metal stick or glorified deodorant..
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.9 In reply to 39888.2 
I voted "other" because I wouldn't bother with one for defence, but I want one for fun. :C
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  JonCooper   
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
39888.10 In reply to 39888.9 
I never considered that - trust you to come up with a reasonable option not previously covered

Jon
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Drew (X3N0PH0N)  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.11 In reply to 39888.1 
What PB said. I wouldn't want one for defence, partly for moral reasons, partly because I don't think they're a particularly effective form of defence in anything but very well trained hands.

I'd like one for fun though.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  ALL
39888.12 
I'd like one for killing things. Cats mainly.

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
39888.13 In reply to 39888.12 
I'd presently like one to use on people who refuse to upgrade IE. :[
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
39888.14 In reply to 39888.13 
I'd like to use one on people who insist that others (e.g. me) should have to use IE at all. And cats.

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
39888.15 In reply to 39888.14 
Well yes. but at least if you can upgrade to IE9 I don't have to spend several hours coming up with workarounds for Microsoft's incompetence.

I had a dream about a cat last night (or possibly the night before). It wasn't the right cat though because it didn't have a black and white face - it was more of all dark grey. I don't remember if the dream was about anything, or what relevance either of the cats had to anything.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
39888.16 In reply to 39888.15 
Well yes. but at least if you can upgrade to IE9 I don't have to spend several hours coming up with workarounds for Microsoft's incompetence.

They're bound to introduce a new one that you hadn't thought of.

I prefer Safari, although I could accept Chrome, especially since Safari on Windows (which we're forced to use at work) is going the way of IE Mac. Hell's teeth, if it really came down to it I could use Firefox, but I hate myself for saying that.

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
39888.17 In reply to 39888.16 
Nah, IE9 is actually acceptable from a webdev point of view (see attached for support of HTML5/CSS3).

Safari on Windows has already gone - can't be downloaded any more and existing installs don't receive security updates.

Attachments:

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
39888.18 In reply to 39888.17 
If you define 'acceptable' as adherence to standards (which you have), then I'm sure you're right. If it's anything like IE8 from a usability perspective, then I beg to differ. But anyone's MMV!

bastard by name
bastard by nature

If Feds call you and say something bad on me, it may prove what I said are truth, they are afraid of it.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)  
 To:  99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)     
39888.19 In reply to 39888.18 
Oh no, from a usability perspective it's way worse than IE8.

Worst desktop browser out there in that regard.

Whichever fuckwits decided on and allowed the ridiculous UI need to be shot. After being forced to lick a dead cats rear for half an hour.
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX)  
 To:  JonCooper      
39888.20 In reply to 39888.2 

I voted Mayhaps, but I have always liked and owned guns anyway. Wife won't let me have one now.

 

She hates me having fun with guns unless I am on an official shoot or range.

 

 

 

 

Web Shite Mail Me

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)     
39888.21 In reply to 39888.19 
Forced? Ya know, some of us like lick that sort of thing,

----
"You have unknowingly complimented the author: telling a journalist they should be a novelist is like telling a stripper they should be a ballerina. "
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All  
 

1–20  21–24


Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats