The Lights Are On! - Teh Forum

Teh ForumThe Lights Are On!

From:	Dan (HERMAND)	14 Aug 2012 16:27
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	12 of 16

39806.12 In reply to 39806.11
And get the sack if he gets caught. Dan Herman

0/0

More

From:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	14 Aug 2012 16:37
To:	Dan (HERMAND)	13 of 16

39806.13 In reply to 39806.12
Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning? So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm? `3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338`

0/0

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Aug 2012 16:46
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	14 of 16

39806.14 In reply to 39806.13
quote: Peter (BOUGHTONP) Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning? *So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm?* Ahahahahahahaha ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

More

From:	patch	14 Aug 2012 17:40
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	15 of 16

39806.15 In reply to 39806.13
There'd be wording along the lines of " actively circumventing the prescribed security procedures" involved.

0/0

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 Aug 2012 18:31
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	16 of 16

39806.16 In reply to 39806.12
Exactly. Like patch says, actively circumventing security. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

More

Reply to All

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 | FAQ | Docs | Support | Donate!

©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats