The Lights Are On!

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	14 Aug 2012 03:24
To:	ALL	1 of 16

39806.1

I'm wondering if this is due to me being so popular?

By reading my posts you agree to my terms of service.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 Aug 2012 07:38
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	2 of 16

39806.2 In reply to 39806.1
I just love it when people hotlink to personal storage, which gets blocked by our webnazis at work. Really I do. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	14 Aug 2012 08:37
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	3 of 16

39806.3 In reply to 39806.2

I know, that's why I do it! But in all honesty it saved there for some reason and I was too lazy to attach it. But I will do so now just for you!

This is the first blue text I've ever received. I feel honored!

By reading my posts you agree to my terms of service.

Attachments:

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 Aug 2012 08:41
To:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	4 of 16

39806.4 In reply to 39806.3
quote: Gun-Toting Hillbilly (SHIELDSIT) But I will do so now just for you! Ahhh, thankee kindly! I saw that this morning too. How odd. quote: Gun-Toting Hillbilly (SHIELDSIT) This is the first blue text I've ever received. Au contraire! And what are you doing up so early/late? bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Ken (SHIELDSIT)	14 Aug 2012 08:43
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	5 of 16

39806.5 In reply to 39806.4

How could I forget about that? It just happened too!

I'm up early. The weather changed here last night and my body is letting me know all about it.

By reading my posts you agree to my terms of service.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Aug 2012 09:16
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	6 of 16

39806.6 In reply to 39806.2
They block Dropbox?! Madness. ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 Aug 2012 10:00
To:	ANT_THOMAS	7 of 16

39806.7 In reply to 39806.6
The one thing you can guarantee with nazis is madness. Any type of personal backup/storage is blocked by Webnonsense. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Aug 2012 10:01
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	8 of 16

39806.8 In reply to 39806.7
I assume you're not allowed to use USB drives either? ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 Aug 2012 10:12
To:	ANT_THOMAS	9 of 16

39806.9 In reply to 39806.8

Odd enough, yes, because that's not accessed through t'internet.

Nazis may be mad, but they ain't brainy.

bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Aug 2012 10:13
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	10 of 16

39806.10 In reply to 39806.9
(fail) ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	14 Aug 2012 14:05
To:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	11 of 16

39806.11 In reply to 39806.9
So when you're next at home, put the Tor bundle onto a USB drive, and then use that at work and you can probably bypass all the websense and over-caching crap. `3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Dan (HERMAND)	14 Aug 2012 16:27
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	12 of 16

39806.12 In reply to 39806.11
And get the sack if he gets caught. Dan Herman

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	14 Aug 2012 16:37
To:	Dan (HERMAND)	13 of 16

39806.13 In reply to 39806.12
Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning? So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm? `3.1415P265E589T932E846R64338`

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	ANT_THOMAS	14 Aug 2012 16:46
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	14 of 16

39806.14 In reply to 39806.13
quote: Peter (BOUGHTONP) Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning? *So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm?* Ahahahahahahaha ┌─────┐ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┘ └─┘

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	patch	14 Aug 2012 17:40
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	15 of 16

39806.15 In reply to 39806.13
There'd be wording along the lines of " actively circumventing the prescribed security procedures" involved.

0/0

Reply Quote

More

From:	99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)	14 Aug 2012 18:31
To:	Peter (BOUGHTONP)	16 of 16

39806.16 In reply to 39806.12
Exactly. Like patch says, actively circumventing security. bastard by name, bastard by nature

0/0

Reply Quote

More