Ranter's CornerHobnobs :@

 

Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
 
 
  
 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)   
 To:  Dr Nick (FOZZA)     
42914.6 In reply to 42914.5 
Well I don't know if reducing quantity whilst increasing price qualifies as value engineering? Maybe the shitty packaging is a cheaper material, but there's no indicating of the actual biscuits changing, and there's no presentation of additional function. (There is less function because they can't stand up any more! :@)

Even if it does, I'm not sure dishonest euphemisms count as irony.

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Matt  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)      
42914.7 In reply to 42914.6 
Shrinkflation
0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)   
 To:  Matt     
42914.8 In reply to 42914.7 
Well the description fits, but it's a silly name.

Also, the worst part of this all is the choice of a prime number, and not just that but probably the most annoying prime number too. :@

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)   
 To:  ALL
42914.9 
Chocolate Hobnobs come in packs of 23.

Also twin-packs that are 2x14.

But to make matters worse, this madness appears to have summoned the return of Rendle's favourite comedian. :|

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

 From:  william (WILLIAMA)  
 To:  Peter (BOUGHTONP)      
42914.10 In reply to 42914.9 
There is a lot of chatter about him all of a sudden. He's going down the "supports a worthy cause" root and nobody knew except, gosh darn, how ever did the news slip out? The man's practically a saint.

His hobnob links go back a while. Presumably whoever he got his material from, or whoever he pays to churn it out now, considers hobnobs an easy shorthand for crumbly biscuits. Annoying though.

He May Be Your Dog But He's Wearing My Collar

0/0
 Reply   Quote More 

Reply to All    
 

1–10

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size : Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.5.2 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2025 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats