Stalker 8 word review

From: william (WILLIAMA)26 May 2021 10:59
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 5 of 9
The first time I saw it, I definitely had a sense of "this is ART so I'd better be virtuous and watch it" even though my eyes blinked and my head nodded a few times. But it's one of those that get better and better on subsequent viewings. 
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)27 May 2021 19:36
To: william (WILLIAMA) 6 of 9
I found it more than a bit glacial in pacing, unlike Andrei Rublev. Can't remember if I ever watched it all the way through.
From: william (WILLIAMA)27 May 2021 21:02
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 7 of 9
I watched Andrei Rublev when I was too young. The extreme nonchalence of the brutality didn't encourage love in my heart. But, you're right. Andrei Rublev follows an easier path with a sense of timing that fits better with a conventional schedule. if you really want to love Tarkovsky, then Solaris is the easiest watch. It's also a brilliant film.

I just got a copy of Andrei Rublev from Jim, and although I REALLY don't want to, I'll watch it again. Just because...
From: william (WILLIAMA)27 May 2021 21:27
To: william (WILLIAMA) 8 of 9
To be 100% honest, Stalker would have been one of my least favourite films a few years ago. It grew on me. A bit like Moon in June grew on me until it's one of my fave LP tracks (or sides or whatever) even though it's Soft machine and not exactly what many people would like.
EDITED: 27 May 2021 21:27 by WILLIAMA
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)28 May 2021 11:47
To: william (WILLIAMA) 9 of 9
Andrei Rublev is one of the most brilliant films ever made in my estimation. It made me aware that the DP is (or rather, can be) more than a glorified technician.