FLAC

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)15 Jun 2015 10:33
To: ALL4 of 18
TLDR
From: ANT_THOMAS15 Jun 2015 10:34
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 5 of 18
Ditto. Doesn't look quite as straight forward as sticking a disc in and churning out some FLACs.
EDITED: 15 Jun 2015 10:35 by ANT_THOMAS
From: graphitone15 Jun 2015 10:55
To: ANT_THOMAS 6 of 18
Wow, above and beyond dude, thanks for that. :J

I've read the first one, and will have another go with the Audio Extractor tonight. I'll work my way through the 2nd bit this aft if it's quiet here.

It can be a bit niche, but does anyone here have any DVD-As and if you have, what've you got?

 
From: graphitone17 Jun 2015 09:04
To: ANT_THOMAS 7 of 18
I've tried the first way again through the DVD Audio Extractor and it's created a multichannel FLAC file. The music sounds good, though there's something niggling that's not quite right when compared with the original disc. It is minimal though, so not too bothered at the moment.

I've tried the second, more involved way, but stumbled at the first hurdle - that link to the DVD ripping tools doesn't work and I couldn't find PPCMRipper anywhere.

I'm now onto ripping the DVDs and blu-rays. I tried out ripping the first LOTR film using Aiseesoft's blu-ray ripper (which does both formats) and it's working well, it took around an hour a disc to complete though. The audio's spot on, but had to fiddle around getting the subwoofer set up, the yamaha's auto YPAO setup was a bit conservative with with the dB levels, to the point it was effectively off.

 
EDITED: 17 Jun 2015 09:10 by GRAPHITONE
From: ANT_THOMAS17 Jun 2015 09:22
To: graphitone 8 of 18
Is there something different with the hardware you're playing it back on? (or in your head?) Since it is lossless.

I'd just download a high quality rip with master audio or a full blu-ray rip. Someone else has no doubt already done what you're trying to do.
EDITED: 17 Jun 2015 09:22 by ANT_THOMAS
From: graphitone17 Jun 2015 09:54
To: ANT_THOMAS 9 of 18
That's not a bad idea, but I like trying to do this stuff myself. It could well be in my head - I was off sick yesterday with a migraine (it was weirdly painless, but kept feeling sick and getting the aura thing, which was a first for me), so probably not in the best frame of mind for it. :J

It could be an amp setting I've not found yet. I'm playing the original DVD-A through a player connected to the amp via an optical cable, whereas the rip is streamed from my PC via the HDMI on the Pi. It could be a difference in the modes set up for each of those interfaces.

Even though it's lossless the ripping software gives me different sample rates to rip it at, would that not affect the quality?!
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)17 Jun 2015 10:01
To: ANT_THOMAS graphitone 10 of 18
quote: graphitone
Even though it's lossless the ripping software gives me different sample rates to rip it at,

Does that even make sense for lossless?

From: ANT_THOMAS17 Jun 2015 10:11
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 11 of 18
FLAC is encoded, rather than a direct data copy and put in a different container, so samples rates do kinda make sense. But I've never played with FLAC so I don't really know.
From: graphitone17 Jun 2015 10:15
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 12 of 18
From the second, lengthy tutorial above:
 
Quote: 
Not all DVD-As are 96kHz. Some stereo tracks are 192kHz, and a lot of digitally-produced albums can have odd/low sample rates.
:/

Given the option of a sample rate, what do I go for if a 'same as source' isn't available? I'm doing all this from memory, so I'll screenshot the relevant stuff tonight.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)17 Jun 2015 12:14
To: ANT_THOMAS graphitone 13 of 18
OIC. I only rip to ALAC using iTunes. It doesn't give bitrate options. But that may simply be Apple trying to keep it simple for the dumbarses. Like me.
From: graphitone17 Jun 2015 22:56
To: ANT_THOMAS 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 14 of 18
Here's the thing. Sample rate and bits per sample all affect file size as you'd expect. I've been using the highest settings, which unsuprisingly chuck out the biggest files sizes.

 
Attachments:
From: koswix17 Jun 2015 23:45
To: graphitone 15 of 18
Surely you want the settings to match the source material?
From: Chris (CHRISSS)18 Jun 2015 07:04
To: koswix 16 of 18
But which one?
Attachments:
From: ANT_THOMAS18 Jun 2015 09:02
To: graphitone 17 of 18
From what I can tell the bitrate doesn't matter. It will still be lossless. The only thing that changes with a lower bitrate is the time it takes to encode.

Your sauce file isn't working. But you want to have the same sample rate at the original material. No point going higher.
From: graphitone18 Jun 2015 09:09
To: koswix 18 of 18
Yep, the thing now is to find where I find the place that that info can be found.