Wil "E" Lanzarote

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Feb 2015 20:41
To: milko 19 of 57
And who hasn't heard of

From: koswix 2 Feb 2015 20:43
To: milko 20 of 57
It's like Chinese food. In China, it's just food. Much like whisky. In Scotland, whisky is food.
From: milko 2 Feb 2015 20:58
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 21 of 57
Yeah, it's ok for products, see.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Feb 2015 21:18
To: milko 22 of 57
Sticky kilts?
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Feb 2015 21:34
To: milko 23 of 57
This is my grandpa on my mom's side: http://www.ancestry.ca/genealogy/ww1-canadian-soldiers/Nathaniel-Gow.html

My grandma grew up in Dufftown, but they met in Boston (US) and then again in Saint John, NB after the war, where they settled.

So that makes me 100 proof. Or maybe it's the booze. :-{)
 
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 2 Feb 2015 21:46
To: milko 24 of 57
More to the point, in that case 'Scotch' is a brand name.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Feb 2015 22:00
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 25 of 57
Quote: 
The use of the term Scotch in the name was a pejorative meaning "stingy" in the 1920s and 1930s. The brandname Scotch came about around 1925 while Richard Drew was testing his first masking tape to determine how much adhesive he needed to add. The bodyshop painter became frustrated with the sample masking tape and exclaimed, "Take this tape back to those Scotch bosses of yours and tell them to put more adhesive on it!"[2][3] The name was soon applied to the entire line of 3M tapes. Scotty McTape, a kilt-wearing cartoon boy, was the brand's mascot for two decades, first appearing in 1944.[4] The familiar tartan design, a take on the well-known Wallace tartan, was introduced in 1945.[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotch_Tape

EDITED: 2 Feb 2015 22:02 by DSMITHHFX
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 2 Feb 2015 22:08
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 26 of 57
I'm not sure what the point is that you're making.
Scotch is an adjective meaning "of Scotland". The modern usage in Scotland is Scottish or Scots, and the word "Scotch" is only applied to specific products...
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Feb 2015 22:14
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 27 of 57
Dodgy origin.
From: milko 2 Feb 2015 22:14
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 28 of 57
Scotty McTape!
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 2 Feb 2015 22:20
To: milko 29 of 57
From: graphitone 2 Feb 2015 22:55
To: patch 30 of 57
 :-P
From: fixrman 2 Feb 2015 23:04
To: graphitone 31 of 57
What about the boots? And the ticking?
From: ANT_THOMAS 3 Feb 2015 10:04
To: graphitone 32 of 57
I am fairly appalled at the poor grammar I see whilst at work. Maybe I just assume people give a shit as much as I do about things like this.
From: graphitone 3 Feb 2015 10:07
To: fixrman 33 of 57
I'll provide my own boots. I like a well worn in pair.

Not sure what you mean by ticking? If that's a typo and you meant tickling, then no. I don't go in for any of that kinky stuff.
From: fixrman 3 Feb 2015 16:10
To: graphitone 34 of 57
It is a movie line. 9 1/2 weeks.

Wish I could find a clip. Only me.
From: graphitone 4 Feb 2015 12:17
To: fixrman 35 of 57
Ah I see...

Quoting films is fine as long as the other person gets it! I'm in no way getting at you here, but it's reminded me of something my brother-in-law does. He watches a load of TV and films and has a fairly good recall of the script/lines. He's a quiet soul, but when you do get him talking he often quotes shows to the point he just inserts them into conversation without thinking, most often an obscure reference that doesn't quite fit, plus he's not an actor and just reciting lines in his monotone doesn't really convey the original meaning. He usually then has to explain what the hell he was on about. :/

It brings to mind that idea that there's no original thought anymore and everything we think and say is based on regurgitated prior knowledge. But, I guess that's the learning process for you.
 
From: fixrman 4 Feb 2015 12:56
To: graphitone 36 of 57
Quote: 
most often an obscure reference that doesn't quite fit, plus he's not an actor and just reciting lines in his monotone doesn't really convey the original meaning. He usually then has to explain what the hell he was on about.

Well, I do have a more British sense of humour.  :-B I thought you'd get it. Actually, my humour while tending more to the dry, British side can be somewhat abstract; some really get it, some don't. My brother for instance, can find humour in nearly anything. Occasionally I have to explain, in a more abstract Bob Hope sort of way. But I never use monotone, am quite animated and generally put those quotes in where they fit. The bed-buying scene to me was funny because they did go on a bit about the "ticking" and as I recall were making fun of the salesman because of it. It was a fairly popular movie, for Basinger (yum) and Rourke, both at their prime. Now I feel like your brother or Cliff Clavin on Cheers!, so perhaps I should move on...

Quote: 

It brings to mind that idea that there's no original thought anymore and everything we think and say is based on regurgitated prior knowledge.

Perhaps in your brother's case, that is true - but not in mine. I am full of original thought. Full of it.  %-) Regurgitated prior knowledge? I'd say we all are guilty of that from time to time, don't you think? We all share what we know or have learned in the past from time to time. JFK quotes, historical quotes and references... I could probably pull a couple hundred out of posts in any forum.

Oh, well - sorry. Maybe you should see the movie again. Dated, but KB isn't difficult to look at throughout the film and there are certainly other reasons to watch it other than just for the ticking and her visage. The acting was particularly good by both, not something I can say about many of the regurgitated themes and scripts of many films today.

Actually, isn't this thread a regurgitated cartoon reference?  :-O

EDITED: 4 Feb 2015 12:59 by FIXRMAN
From: koswix 4 Feb 2015 13:01
To: fixrman 37 of 57
Quote: 
Regurgitated prior knowledge? I'd say we all are guilty of that from time to time, don't you think? 
ISWYDT
From: graphitone 4 Feb 2015 13:19
To: fixrman 38 of 57
Quote: 
I'd say we all are guilty of that from time to time, don't you think?

I'm not saying it's a bad thing, what's language if not the same thing? It's just underwhelming that which people normally make of it. Damn, that's a horrible sentence. But probably original. :/

Never seen 9 1/2 weeks. :J