1–1011–2021–30…41–48

Makes me ANGRY

From: Manthorp29 Aug 2014 09:07
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 15 of 48
41179.15 In reply to 41179.14
Ponies are effete affectations of the bourgoisie.  Political correctness gone mad.  We want mini-dinosaurs and we cannot lie.
Reply
+1/1
From: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)29 Aug 2014 09:30
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 16 of 48
41179.16 In reply to 41179.14
I'll ask everyone I know to vote Yes because I want miniature dinosaurs. (Rather than asking them to vote Yes because I believe it's an opportunity for a more progressive and socially democratic nation which better suits the needs of the people, like I've been doing just now).
Reply
+1/1
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)29 Aug 2014 10:27
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 17 of 48
41179.17 In reply to 41179.16
I am entirely for 'Yes' for all of the reasons you said. Unfortunately you'll saddle us with a permanent Tory government. So fuck you.
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS29 Aug 2014 10:28
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 18 of 48
41179.18 In reply to 41179.17
That's my issue with this independence thing. Love them to vote Yes for their own benefit but it fucks us when it comes to our parliament.
Reply
0/0
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)29 Aug 2014 10:29
To: ANT_THOMAS 19 of 48
41179.19 In reply to 41179.18
Still, it'll be our own fault. Referendum for Northern independence tbh.
Reply
0/0
From: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)29 Aug 2014 10:55
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 20 of 48
41179.20 In reply to 41179.17
Yeah, sorry about that. Unfortunately, I think you'll get a Tory government regardless of what happens in Scotland.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2014 11:37
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 21 of 48
41179.21 In reply to 41179.17
Makes me wonder why the hell Cameron is opposing independence from the whinging Scots. Surely it would help the Tories.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2014 11:41
To: Manthorp 22 of 48
41179.22 In reply to 41179.15
quote: Manthorp
Ponies are effete affectations of the bourgoisie.

Ahhhh...small enough for you?


Just need to hope SimonR does stop by for a perve.

Reply
0/0
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)29 Aug 2014 11:42
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 23 of 48
41179.23 In reply to 41179.20
Might personally secede and join Scotland.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix29 Aug 2014 17:26
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 24 of 48
41179.24 In reply to 41179.16
You'll probably find that more effective.

Personally I'm voting yes just so that Andy Murray can be Scottish when he wins, too.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix29 Aug 2014 17:27
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 25 of 48
41179.25 In reply to 41179.21
Because he needs the income from Scotland. And all his mates need the oil contracts.
Reply
0/0
From: Manthorp29 Aug 2014 17:31
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 26 of 48
41179.26 In reply to 41179.22
Hang it from the lamp-post!  Or send it to plough (yj) on a collective farm.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2014 17:32
To: koswix 27 of 48
41179.27 In reply to 41179.25
Probably nothing more than speculative propaganda.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2014 17:33
To: Manthorp 28 of 48
41179.28 In reply to 41179.26
I don't think it would be tenderised significantly by hanging TBH
Reply
+1/1
From: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)29 Aug 2014 18:31
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 29 of 48
41179.29 In reply to 41179.27
Don't get us started on the oil, Nigel, or we'll never be done. In the last few weeks we've been told:
  • The oil is running out, and this is a disaster for the Yes campaign.
  • The oil is running out, and this is a disaster for the No campaign.
  • The oil isn't running out, and this is a disaster for the Yes campaign.
  • The oil isn't running out, and this is a disaster for the No campaign.
  • There are vast untapped oil reserves yet to be exploited and this is great for the UK.
  • There are vast untapped oil reserves yet to be exploited and this is a complete and utter disaster for an independent Scotland because we won't be able to cope with it.
As far as I can see, we've got a great source of renewable energy in the form of hot air blasting from both camps.
Reply
+1/1
From: koswix29 Aug 2014 19:29
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 30 of 48
41179.30 In reply to 41179.27
What kenneth said.
Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper29 Aug 2014 20:00
To: ALL31 of 48
41179.31
I wouldn't mind someone explaining why they think the Pound is a UK asset and should be shared between both countries but the oil only belongs to Scotland. 
Reply
0/0
From: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)30 Aug 2014 10:36
To: JonCooper 32 of 48
41179.32 In reply to 41179.31
It's the law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_Scotland%27s_oil
 
Quote: 

Given that Scotland is not a sovereign state, it has no effective maritime boundaries; and any claims Scotland may assert are subsumed as part of claims made by the United Kingdom. It could be argued that there is no definitive 'Scottish' sector of the North Sea in the same way there isn't a Norwegian sector or a Danish sector, or indeed a UK sector. However due to the existence of two separate legal systems in Great Britain — that of Scots law pertaining to Scotland and English law pertaining to England and Wales, constitutional law in the United Kingdom has provided for the division of the UK sector of the North Sea into specific Scottish and English components.[5] The Continental Shelf Act 1964 and the Continental Shelf (Jurisdiction) Order 1968 defines the UK North Sea maritime area to the north of latitude 55 degrees north as being under the jurisdiction of Scots law[6] meaning that 90% of the UK's oil resources were under Scottish jurisdiction.[7][8] In addition, section 126 of the Scotland Act 1998 defines Scottish waters as the internal waters and territorial sea of the United Kingdom as are adjacent to Scotland.[9] This has been subsequently amended by the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundary Order 1999 which redefined the extent of Scottish waters and Scottish fishery limits.[10][11]

Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS30 Aug 2014 10:40
To: JonCooper 33 of 48
41179.33 In reply to 41179.31
Would you like Cornwall to keep the pound?
Reply
0/0
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)30 Aug 2014 17:27
To: JonCooper 34 of 48
41179.34 In reply to 41179.31
Using the pound in a currency union is their preferred option simply because it works better for both parties. Scotland gets a stable, well-backed currency with debt capacity and the UK gets Scotland to pay its share of that debt. It's not like they'd demanding we share it, just that it'd be *fucking idiotic* of the UK to refuse.
Reply
0/0