DFS patching - one at a time?

From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)24 Mar 2014 10:50
To: ALL1 of 8
Howdy folks,
I'm looking to patch a couple of Windows servers running a DFS namespace, partly because they're out of date, and partly because I'm vaguely hoping the patches may fix some performance issues. I've hit a bit of a wall in terms of what the best procedures may be however, and I need a bit of help.
  • Should I be upgrading the servers one at a time, a week or so apart? Would that be ok, or would it confuse DFS even more?
  • Should I temporarily turn off replication while doing all this?
Help a confused alien  :-( Thank you!
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)24 Mar 2014 12:30
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 2 of 8
I don't get what Windows servers have to do with sofas.
From: ANT_THOMAS24 Mar 2014 12:50
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 3 of 8
Interest free servers?
From: Dan (HERMAND)24 Mar 2014 13:44
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 4 of 8
You should be able to patch them one at a time, but if you're having problems already I think I'd disable replication and take the cautious route.
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)24 Mar 2014 14:23
To: ANT_THOMAS 5 of 8
Think I'll wait for a sale.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)24 Mar 2014 15:00
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 6 of 8
You shouldn't have to wait long.
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)24 Mar 2014 16:10
To: Dan (HERMAND) 7 of 8
Thanks Dan; not real problems as such, it just seems to be rather slow at coping with updates to the files - if you, say, add a 200MB file or delete a few hundred files, it will become rather slow for a while (half a minute maybe? Maybe less?) while it catches up. It's not usually an issue, but these things tend to happen near market open and close when a load of files are read & updated, so the issue just compounds itself.

We could of course not use DFS anymore, but it's so easy and convenient...
From: Dave!!24 Mar 2014 18:27
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 8 of 8
True, there's always SCS instead.