Please Watch

From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)23 Aug 2013 13:05
To: koswix 13 of 41
A video
From: Linn (INDYLS)23 Aug 2013 14:28
To: ALL14 of 41
This thread does not deliver. 40 minute videos...pfft, like we have an attention span that long.   
From: Manthorp23 Aug 2013 14:59
To: Linn (INDYLS) 15 of 41
And there isn't even a single cat falling into a bath.
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)23 Aug 2013 15:01
To: Linn (INDYLS) 16 of 41
The video is almost 2 hours long, I just want you to at least watch the first 40 minutes.
From: Linn (INDYLS)23 Aug 2013 22:06
To: Manthorp 17 of 41
I know, right. No cute animals or explosions in the first 30 seconds, I'm done.  :) 
From: Linn (INDYLS)23 Aug 2013 22:09
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 18 of 41
In all honesty, if you had provided some context and a reason to watch, I may have. But a "watch this" just doesn't do it when I have other things competing for my attention. 
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)23 Aug 2013 23:51
To: Linn (INDYLS) 19 of 41
I explained what it was I wanted everyone to see in other posts.  I was pressed for time when I posted the video so I didn't have a chance to explain what it was.  Sorry!  Wait a minute, I'm not from Canada so I'm not sorry!
From: Linn (INDYLS)24 Aug 2013 00:06
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 20 of 41
You can be an honorary sorry Canadian. :)
 
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)24 Aug 2013 00:50
To: Linn (INDYLS) 21 of 41
yay! I like that idea!
From: Linn (INDYLS)24 Aug 2013 01:00
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 22 of 41
I dub thee Sorry Canadian. Put down your guns and make your way to the other side.  :-O~~~  
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 Aug 2013 01:38
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 23 of 41
There's a transcript finally available.

I got a few pages in and these guys really are fucking annoying twats... if it was anyone other than you asking I would have stopped reading by now. :/

Fortunately, it's a lot easier to skip text than voice - for the benefit of others, jump straight to page 7* and you wont miss anything important.

*(For the text or html formats, searching for "smart guy" will take you to where page 7 is.)

EDITED: 24 Aug 2013 01:41 by BOUGHTONP
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)24 Aug 2013 02:02
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 24 of 41
That's actually pretty flattering PB, are you feeling OK?

Seriously though, what do you think about what's going on?  It seems they are actually going to stop free speech and go after reporters.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 Aug 2013 02:13
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 25 of 41
I don't think. It's not safe to think. They'll soon be after anyone who commits thought crimes. :S
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)24 Aug 2013 02:14
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 26 of 41
 :-(  :'-( 

I just realized after watching that podcast that every email I get from teh is being scanned.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 Aug 2013 02:30
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 27 of 41
Maybe we should try to get everyone in the whole world to insert explosive words into every message to trigger all the flags and get the bloody bastards chasing after endless decoys.

That's still safe to say, right? I'm not going to wake up to find black helicopters hovering outside the window and Gunther Hermann banging on my door...? :/

From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)24 Aug 2013 02:35
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 28 of 41
All we'd have to do is encrypt all our mail.  Just huge empty files all encrypted up. They are saving all that.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)24 Aug 2013 02:37
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 29 of 41
I don't think they care. They seem to have the capacity.

Laputan machine.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 Aug 2013 02:39
To: Matt Ken (SHIELDSIT) 30 of 41
Now there's a feature for Beehive - allow public keys as profile fields, and when populated use it to send encrypted emails.

Also, why is there no SSL setup for Teh. Can just use a self-signed certificate to get the TLS benefits, right?

From: Matt24 Aug 2013 09:36
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 31 of 41
Can do, but have fun trying to convince all browsers to accept the self signed certificate. Probably be cheaper in time and effort to just buy a real cert.

Or not be so paranoid.
EDITED: 24 Aug 2013 09:37 by MATT
From: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)24 Aug 2013 10:14
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 32 of 41
I'm not going to watch that video, and I'm not going to read the transcript , but do they mention anywhere whether The Feds consider using encrypted communications as a signifier of suspicious activity, and therefore would be more likely to flag you up? From what I remember, it's an offence not to give up your PGP keys when asked, so all in all, if you've got nothing to hide, using encryption is just going to make you look suspicious, and if you do have something to hide, They'll just beat your keys out of you.