JQueryMobile TWR

From: af (CAER)24 May 2012 18:17
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 10 of 32
What do you think of my WoW minipets site? It doesn't have a whole separate 'mobile version', rather just some mobile-specific (via media queries) CSS that make it work better on a small screen. I don't think there's even any mobile-specific JS, and it uses the full version of jQuery.

It depends on the site but do wonder why some even have an entirely separate mobile version – if they didn't weigh their pages down with so much crap it wouldn't be necessary in may cases.

edit: I've only tried it on my iphone so there might be some issues in the various Android browsers, although since they're WebKit-based, hopefully not.
EDITED: 24 May 2012 18:19 by CAER
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)24 May 2012 19:02
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 11 of 32
But you're so easily annoyed. There's pills you can take, though I prefer the 7% solution.

Seriously though, that screen shot is about as offensive as a bingo card. It's shit "In every single way" ? Really? Who cares?

My first take on designing custom websites for smart phones is that the screen real estate is so constrained by a) small pixel dimensions and b) touch-screen that there's not much room to do cool stuff.

Most of the jqm featured gallery sites have far better desktop browser pages than mobile. Apart from that though, the functionality is pretty well thought out.

Not many take the one-size-fits-all-least-common-denominator approach as suggested here.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 May 2012 19:03
To: af (CAER) 12 of 32
Too much scrolling.

Maybe default to showing no names until a search is entered?
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 May 2012 19:04
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 13 of 32
Do NOT get me started on bingo cards! :@ :@ :@
From: af (CAER)24 May 2012 22:12
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 14 of 32
Hrm, that's an interesting idea actually. Maybe I could then have a 'browse all' button or something - as it stands it's still worth loading all the data at once since it's less than 100K, and only about 20K gzipped.

/thoughts
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)24 May 2012 22:55
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 15 of 32
Unlike Xen, I still don't get it. That's a pretty crap design, admittedly, but what has that got to do with JQM's functionality? Are you damning a functionality aid simply because it's used by people with terrible design skills? In that case, you might as well shoot Damian Hirst's paint supplier. Perhaps not such a bad idea.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)24 May 2012 23:02
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 16 of 32
I think I'm more damning a wing supplier for using feathers and wax.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)25 May 2012 02:25
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 17 of 32
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)25 May 2012 02:36
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 18 of 32
You're way too late - I drank yours ages ago. :C
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)25 May 2012 02:41
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 19 of 32
Greedy fucking asshole :((

<drinks the humidity out of the air>
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)25 May 2012 02:52
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 20 of 32
It only would have gone cold. :(
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)25 May 2012 03:08
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 21 of 32
I remember cold :((

Cold is nice :((
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)25 May 2012 03:37
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 22 of 32
Yeah. :(

Supposed to be raining and cooling down now, but it doesn't appear to be doing so.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)25 May 2012 03:43
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 23 of 32
I have realised that making houses of bricks is a stupid idea. They heat up during the day and release that heat during the night. I want a wooden house. And aircon.
EDITED: 25 May 2012 03:43 by X3N0PH0N
From: patch25 May 2012 07:54
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 24 of 32
Move to Australia, then. They love building stuff like that over there. Even though half the town disappears every time there's a storm.
From: Manthorp25 May 2012 08:06
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 25 of 32
Do you need to ask? It's BeeP. Code is meticulous and unforgiving.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)25 May 2012 08:11
To: patch 26 of 32
:|
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)25 May 2012 10:18
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 27 of 32
Your reply doesn't make any sense, particularly in regard to the fact that you're earlier 'justification' was based on aesthetics, not functionality. Are you saying that JQM is funtionally inferior, or that you don't like it because you just don't like it?
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)25 May 2012 10:19
To: Manthorp 28 of 32
Not to mention the keyboard ... don't forget the perilous sides of the left shift key.
EDITED: 25 May 2012 10:19 by MR_BASTARD
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)25 May 2012 16:39
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 29 of 32
He hasn't used it, but doesn't like what (some) others have used it for, giving a rather dull but otherwise innocuous example of what he "hates" (misapplied iPhone chrome). Apparently. I guess.