Timelapse-me-do

From: koswix 1 May 2012 19:12
To: Killamarshian (HAL9001) 10 of 81

That's cool.

 

this is the best one I've managed so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUsN6tvMMA

 

I think the direction the clouds are moving is really important, side to side doesn't look so impressive as towards/away from the camera.

From: Killamarshian (HAL9001) 1 May 2012 19:23
To: koswix 11 of 81
Excellent, looks like you picked a good day for it. Love the bubbling clouds
From: ANT_THOMAS 1 May 2012 19:31
To: koswix 12 of 81








This one being automated by my phone....

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 2 May 2012 07:56
To: ANT_THOMAS 13 of 81

Premiere = video
Encore = audio

From: ANT_THOMAS 2 May 2012 08:45
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 14 of 81
There's another video one then. More for authoring?
From: ANT_THOMAS 2 May 2012 09:37
To: ANT_THOMAS 15 of 81
After Effects is what I was thinking of. Not exactly authoring.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 2 May 2012 10:00
To: ANT_THOMAS 16 of 81
Yeah, AE is more for compositing. You could do time-lapse in it, I guess, but it's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. And a pretty awkward sledgehammer at that.
From: ANT_THOMAS 2 May 2012 10:07
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 17 of 81

Yeah, definitely not the right tool.

 

I'd like to learn to use it a bit to even just add simple text overlays to things.

From: milko 2 May 2012 10:20
To: ANT_THOMAS 18 of 81
it's very easy to use to do that, although you'd be barely scraping the feature set - most video editors let you do that already built in.
From: ANT_THOMAS 2 May 2012 10:29
To: milko 19 of 81
Yeah, definitely very basic. With a few swooshy in out things of text. Nothing fancy.
EDITED: 2 May 2012 10:32 by ANT_THOMAS
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 2 May 2012 10:31
To: ANT_THOMAS 20 of 81
Like Milko says, most video editors can do that with far less pain.
From: ANT_THOMAS 2 May 2012 10:33
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 21 of 81

Indeed. Any suggestions?

 

I always end up going back to whatever I've got installed from Adobe CS because half of the editors out there seem completely shit, or can't handle HD/H264 properly. Or maybe I haven't looked into this enough.

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 2 May 2012 11:32
To: ANT_THOMAS 22 of 81
Unfortunately (for you, not me), I use FCP, so that doesn't help. But any of the main Windows competition (Premiere, Vegas etc) should have demo or laddish versions to play with.
EDITED: 2 May 2012 11:33 by MR_BASTARD
From: koswix 3 May 2012 16:04
To: ALL23 of 81

Whitby to Edinburgh, a 4 hour drive in 1 minute 6 seconds.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi82KaKVbCw

From: ANT_THOMAS 3 May 2012 16:20
To: koswix 24 of 81

Did you deliberately pan around a bit?

 

I'm planning on doing something similar when I go on a road trip to Germany in July.

From: koswix 3 May 2012 16:20
To: ANT_THOMAS 25 of 81
Only at one bit, the rest is down to the camera not being mounted on anything and occasionally having to be pushed back into position :$
From: ANT_THOMAS 3 May 2012 16:23
To: koswix 26 of 81

I thought as much :D

 

I'm hoping to commandeer my girlfriends old HTC Wildfire to mount in the car in a reasonable position. I'm thinking a photo per minute. I'd love to do every 10 seconds or something to create something a bit smoother but I think that would be a bit ridiculous to sort afterwards.

From: koswix 3 May 2012 16:31
To: ANT_THOMAS 27 of 81

I did one per 10 seconds and it's waaaay too slow.

 

Ideally I'd just take a video of the drive and then speed it up, the gaps (especially at 60-70-80mph) are just too big other wise.

From: ANT_THOMAS 3 May 2012 16:34
To: koswix 28 of 81

Hmm. I might reduce the resolution of the photos so they're just above 1920 wide. 10 seconds too slow, going to need a big memory card :S

 

Definitely something I need to test out beforehand.

From: koswix 3 May 2012 16:41
To: ANT_THOMAS 29 of 81
I had my 400D set to "medium" quality and I ended up with about 1,600 photos from the drive, taking up 2.65GB of the 4GB card.