...

From: JonCooper19 Jul 2009 16:09
To: spinning_plates 51 of 71
is that 100kph? seems remarkably slow (62mph)
From: spinning_plates19 Jul 2009 22:58
To: JonCooper 52 of 71
It is 100km/h, yes. For doing 150km/h (93mph) you can get an instant roadside impounding of your vehicle, loss of licence and $10,000 (£5,000)fine.
From: ANT_THOMAS19 Jul 2009 23:01
To: spinning_plates 53 of 71

Wow, really?

 

Crazy!

From: spinning_plates19 Jul 2009 23:05
To: ANT_THOMAS 54 of 71
How oten it happen, I don't know, but there are big signs on the highway reminding you every now and then. There are also signs that say "aircraft patrolled" in lots of places, but not many speed cameras - mostly just red light cameras.
From: patch19 Jul 2009 23:38
To: spinning_plates 55 of 71
Some bloke got caught here the other day doing 219km/h (136mph) in a 90km/h (55mph) zone. His car got impounded for a week, but apparently he's kept his licence until the court case in September. Mind you, he's facing his car being scrapped and dangerous driving charges when it does get to court.
From: JonCooper20 Jul 2009 15:41
To: spinning_plates 56 of 71
"aircraft patrolled" ??? ffs, that must be cost effective (not)
From: Jo (JELLS)20 Jul 2009 17:35
To: JonCooper 57 of 71
Given that there are long stretches of highway with nothing around (i mean hundreds of km), aircraft is probably more cost effective.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)20 Jul 2009 18:42
To: Jo (JELLS) 58 of 71
They have a similar approach in Australia.
From: Jo (JELLS)20 Jul 2009 18:57
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 59 of 71
Makes sense there too!
From: JonCooper20 Jul 2009 20:38
To: Jo (JELLS) 60 of 71
if there are 100s of km with no-one else around why does it matter if someone is speeding?
and, by cost effective, I was wondering about the cost of maintaining the aircraft, pilot etc against the revenue it generates
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)20 Jul 2009 20:49
To: Dr Nick (FOZZA) 61 of 71
What's with the name and folder change? :S
From: Jo (JELLS)20 Jul 2009 20:51
To: JonCooper 62 of 71
Because it's against the law, because there are other drivers on the road who might be endangered, because in some areas you could end up smashing into something like a moose (which can kill you even at much lower speeds), in the winter, road conditions aren't optimal, etc.
From: Jo (JELLS)20 Jul 2009 21:01
To: JonCooper 63 of 71
Ontario government press release from 2007 about expanding the OPP air patrol.

Also found this blog report for air patrol results for May 31 of this year - over an 11km stretch of highway.

Also, it's not constant surveillance. The province doesn't have that many planes. This article says it costs about $125/hour to run one of the planes.
From: patch20 Jul 2009 21:52
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 64 of 71
Do they? That would explain why all the road train drivers are stoned off their faces. Must be quite difficult to tell from altitude.
From: JonCooper20 Jul 2009 22:01
To: Jo (JELLS) 65 of 71
I find it highly amusing that they used a plane to nick some poor sod for failing to stop at a stop sign

(it may help if I mention that I do not have a high opinion of the police)
From: paul20 Jul 2009 22:40
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 66 of 71
I was wondering that too...

:Y
From: Mouse20 Jul 2009 22:41
To: paul 67 of 71
It's annoying me. Propper fiddly to click on a full stop with a track pad :(
From: Dr Nick (FOZZA)20 Jul 2009 23:33
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 68 of 71
Not guilty..... :S
From: Mouse20 Jul 2009 23:45
To: Dr Nick (FOZZA) 69 of 71
Says done by you at 17.15 today on the first post edit. How very odd.
From: patch21 Jul 2009 00:16
To: Mouse 70 of 71

I can see how the "points" part of the original title could be turned into a full stop, but how the "speeding" part ended up in a Sanatorium sentence, I don't know.

 

It wasn't me, by the way.