1–10

PCI-E lost

From: Username25 Oct 2007 10:24
To: Username 6 of 10
33386.6 In reply to 33386.1
quote:
"The problem at the moment is that neither ATI nor nVidia seem capable of releasing a decent mid-range card."


And dont I fuckin know it. Sheeshshh :(

code:
"There isn't tons of difference between the 8600 GT and the 8600 GTS, although the GTS is a little bit faster. The biggest problem is that the 8600 GTS is about half the speed of the 8800 GTS. That's a big drop when you're comparing about 60fps in a game to just 35fps."
Reply
0/0
From: Username25 Oct 2007 11:13
To: ALL7 of 10
33386.7 In reply to 33386.6
Come on. You gotta reply sooner than this.
Reply
0/0
From: Dave!!25 Oct 2007 11:28
To: paul 8 of 10
33386.8 In reply to 33386.4

The 2900s aren't terrible. They're roughly on a par with the 8800 GTS cards. The negativity comes because ATI don't have anything better at the moment, hence they don't have a competitor for the GTX or the Ultra.

 

Trig: The X1950 Pro is still a decent card if you don't want to break the bank. Alternatively, see if you can pick up a 320MB version of the 8800 GTS within your budget.

Reply
0/0
From: Username25 Oct 2007 11:31
To: Dave!! 9 of 10
33386.9 In reply to 33386.8

Aye. X1950 Pro it is then.

 

HIS ATI Radeon X1950 Pro ICEQ 3 V2 TURBO SILENT Heatpipe 512MB GDDR3 TV-Out/Dual DVI (PCI-Express)

 

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-070-HT&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=404

Reply
0/0
From: Dave!!25 Oct 2007 12:52
To: Username 10 of 10
33386.10 In reply to 33386.9
That's a good card for the price, and will save you £40 so that you can come to teh Northern meat.
Reply
0/0