Saving

From: Username16 Dec 2006 03:00
To: ALL1 of 22

So then, all you TFT poofs, benders and queers.
How much have you saved on your electricity bill?

 

Iv swicthed from 550W PSU to 300W PSU, removed AGP x8 ATI X800GTO with molex connection and ditched 512mb RAM,.. /and/ also swicthed from PC speakers to Headphones.
Along with replacing Sony DVD Player for a Playstation 2.
No more PC gaming, so its PC (PC case and 17" CRT monitor) OFF and
21" CRT color TV and PS 2 ON.

 

Im saving £4 a month.

From: JonCooper16 Dec 2006 10:48
To: Username 2 of 22
I don't know anyone who'd care enough about saving just £4 a month
From: Dave!!16 Dec 2006 15:27
To: Username 3 of 22
A 550 watt PSU doesn't actually use less power than a 300 watt PSU believe it or not. It's simply /capable/ of providing more power.
From: Username16 Dec 2006 16:59
To: Dave!! 4 of 22

Providing less power = using less power.
Its better to be sound that incompetant with PSUs.
But this 300W is not using too much power.

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)16 Dec 2006 17:15
To: Username 5 of 22
Electricity doesn't quite work like that.

Read this: http://science.howstuffworks.com/question501.htm
From: JonCooper16 Dec 2006 17:39
To: Username 6 of 22
no no no, a 500w PSU is able to provide up to 500w of power, your PC will only draw as much power as it needs

if the components of your PC need 250w to run they'll only use 250w, dosn't make a jot of difference if it comes from a 300w or 500w PSU
From: Ixion16 Dec 2006 17:47
To: Username 7 of 22
A 300W PSU working near 300W will actually use more power than a 500W PSU delivering the same power, typically the eficiency of a PSU gets less the closer to the ultimate limit you run them at.
From: Chris (CHRISSS)16 Dec 2006 18:12
To: Ixion 8 of 22

Looking at some PSU reviews on Tomshardware recently it seems that they are actually more efficient at full load than a medium load and with a light load the efficiency drops off quite a bit with some.

 

Have a looksee here
http://tomshardware.co.uk/2006/02/07/5_power_supplies_get_the_full_juice_treatment_uk/page15.html#efficiency_ratings

From: Ixion17 Dec 2006 10:26
To: Chris (CHRISSS) 9 of 22
I take it all back! I was basing it on the fact that the closer to the limit you push everything the hotter all the components will get and the lesss efficient the PSU is likely to be.
From: spinning_plates20 Dec 2006 17:40
To: JonCooper 10 of 22
I bet if you masturbated less, you'd need less energy, which means less food and probably a saving of at least £4 a month.
From: JonCooper20 Dec 2006 18:22
To: spinning_plates 11 of 22
you should tell Trig, I didn't care enough to save £4 when it was just electric we were talking about :-&
From: spinning_plates20 Dec 2006 22:58
To: JonCooper 12 of 22
Oops, terribly sorry - didn't mean to insinuate you're a wanker or something - the post was supposed to be in reply to the Trigmeister.
EDITED: 20 Dec 2006 22:58 by SPINNING_PLATES
From: Dave!!20 Dec 2006 23:33
To: spinning_plates 13 of 22

Don't worry, Trig'll soon be along to spew out a few profanities and to call you a stupid retard for not clicking the right "reply" button.

 

He's reet good at that he is.

From: Username20 Dec 2006 23:35
To: ALL14 of 22

Im not a fuckin dickhead. I was not born a fuckin dickhead.
I grew up with a Mother and a Father who both worked.

From: Manthorp21 Dec 2006 00:00
To: Username 15 of 22
quote:
Im not a fuckin dickhead. I was not born a fuckin dickhead.


The latter statement I'm prepared to go along with. The former statement is self-evidently bollocks.
From: spinning_plates21 Dec 2006 15:35
To: Manthorp 16 of 22
I think he has Tourettes and thinks that "not" is a profanity.
From: Manthorp22 Dec 2006 21:44
To: Username 17 of 22
Workshy pauper.
From: Username23 Dec 2006 02:31
To: Manthorp 18 of 22
save me
From: Manthorp23 Dec 2006 07:59
To: Username 19 of 22
Tried. Failed. Given up on you. Workshy pauper.
From: Username23 Dec 2006 13:27
To: Manthorp 20 of 22

cruel man
i apply for work reguarly
im just a cheeky person
i have proof of my job searches
stop it