LP :meow:

From: Dave!!12 Sep 2006 10:45
To: JonCooper 33 of 64

I believe it's worse because firstly, a lot more people died, and secondly the Brighton bomb was an attack against a government rather than an attack against ordinary civilians. I'm not saying the Brighton bomb was right, it was deplorable.

 

Similaly with 9/11, most people think of the twin towers. Lots less think of the attack on the Pentagon because that could be constituted as a legitimate military/government target, even if it was a plane full of civilians which was used for the attack.

 

Ultimately, I'm with LP on this one. Does America's foregin policy mean that we should remember or grieve for those civilians who died and their families any less? How would you feel if a terrorist had killed someone you knew? Would it be any more acceptable just because our government's foreign policy is bullshit?

 

Had they lived, many of the victims of 9/11 probably would have been against America's role in Iraq. America is asking for it a lot of the time with its foreign policy, as is Britain to a degree these days. But targetted attacks designed to murder as many ordinary civilians as possible? Regardless of whether it's Al Quaeda, America, Israel, Iraqi insurgents etc, it's never even remotely condonable.

From: -Daz-12 Sep 2006 15:55
To: lp 34 of 64

Where were you on the night of July 28th when Nguku Muntabae was assaulted on Paddington Green?

 

See? It all ties in.

From: JonCooper12 Sep 2006 17:09
To: Dave!! 35 of 64
my concern is that the US thinks it's so much worse when it happens to them, the Brighton bombing was only one incident in a very long campaign of terrorisim that was mostly funded by the USA and in particular by New Yorkers

when they supported and funded the poor Irish against the nasty tyrannical Brits it was ok

but when it's the poor Iraquis or Afganis against the nasty and tyrannical USA that cannot be acceptable

I note that it was proved last week, to the satisfaction of the US Senate, that Iraq did not support, fund or even trust Al Quaeda - so, no WMD & no Terrorists (then) yet we get to bomb the fuck out of them because we don't approve of their leader ~ when are we off to bomb Mugabe ?
From: Dave!!12 Sep 2006 19:17
To: JonCooper 36 of 64

Quite right. I however don't give a damn about the US in general, but I do care about the needless death of civilians wherever it is. 9/11 was an atrocity, but so are most terrorist attacks and a lot of attacks by the US and particulaly recently, Israel.

 

I never feel it OK to even try and justify any of them by thinking for example "What Israel did in Lebanon was bad, therefore that suicide bomber was justified in blowing up that Israeli market place" because the people who die and suffer are just civilians caught up in the mess created by their governments.

Message 30586.37 was deleted
From: SMD12 Sep 2006 20:43
To: lp 38 of 64
quote:
Saif: In 1994 I was 15 & not really that fussed about anything outside my circle of friends & more worried about what band I would discover next or when my next band practice was. Sorry.


I was only 9 at the time, yet I couldn't get away from the whole Rwandan massacre thing, just a couple of years after Bosnia.

Fact of the matter is, the attacks on the World Trade Centre wouldn't be such a 'disaster' if it hadn't have happened in America. The damage was more psychological than collateral.

What's the point in remembering the dead if we don't change the present and the future?
Message 30586.39 was deleted
From: dyl13 Sep 2006 12:31
To: lp 40 of 64

The bit about drinking cider and eating mushrooms: why the "fuck you"? I thought you'd admitted as much. Nowt wrong with it. Though being reformed is undoubtedly working out better for you. Good stuff.

 

(waits to see how you'll contrive to find offence in something I've said...)

 

September 11th - I'm disinclined to be cynical. Shame it always gets the same response, I agree. Though at the point I heard about it on the morning of 11/9/01, I have to admit that my first thought wasn't for the people dying in NY, it was "oh shit, this is just the excuse Bush has been waiting for to declare war on the rest of the world".

Message 30586.41 was deleted
From: Username13 Sep 2006 12:38
To: Mr (M00RL0CK) 42 of 64
<whatever the word is> desensitized. If you see enough of something, it becomes numb and meaningless after the, 1 millionth time you see it.
Desensitized.
EDITED: 13 Sep 2006 12:39 by USERNAME
From: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)13 Sep 2006 12:42
To: Mr (M00RL0CK) 43 of 64
*inured
Message 30586.44 was deleted
From: Sulkpot13 Sep 2006 19:07
To: Mr (M00RL0CK) 45 of 64
quote:
There's a guy in one of my seminars who blames everything on 'society' as if he's saying something profound. Every time he says it, I want to kill people.
"There's no s(dies)
Message 30586.46 was deleted
From: dyl13 Sep 2006 21:07
To: Sulkpot 47 of 64
If only she would.
From: Sulkpot13 Sep 2006 22:51
To: dyl 48 of 64
She'll outlive you, you ephemeral insect. Kept alive by the blood of the innocent !! :-&
From: spinning_plates14 Sep 2006 02:42
To: ALL49 of 64
When this happened I didn't really know anything about anything. Perhaps I still don't. But I do remember thinking "this was not accident" when my boss's wife came into the unit and said to put the TV on, sort of suggesting it was. After that it just made me want to know more about wht the fuck is going on.
From: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42)14 Sep 2006 03:31
To: andy 50 of 64
At least you don't have to live through all the "remember!" crap that's going on over here.
From: Username14 Sep 2006 10:32
To: spinning_plates 51 of 64

I know how you feel. When Lockerbie and the space shuttle disaster happened I had no idea iether.
ALl I can remeber was the sick jocks getting banded around at the secondary school.

From: andy14 Sep 2006 14:24
To: Username 52 of 64
You've gone too far this time. How can you possibly misspell "joke" as "jock"?