Gun Laws

From: fixrman 3 Feb 2016 04:23
To: Harry (HARRYN) 168 of 177
Quote: 
Are you saying it is ok for a police officer to pull over your wife because she made a small driving error, and take your paycheck

A paycheck isn't cash. Mine were hardly enough to warrant suspicion, even when I was at the top of my earning level. Now, if my wife were to be pulled over after a minor driving infraction and allowed(!) a LEO to search the vehicle*, whereupon the officer discovered my trunk was full of cash, I'd have some 'splainin' to do. Especially to my wife.  (nod)

*I have never advised anyone to ever allow a vehicle search for any reason. All of my vehicles were bought pre-owned; how do I know what the previous owner stashed under the carpets or somewhere in a hidden compartment?

 

Quote: 
Suppose you are on your way to the shooting range with 3 of your nicest rifles,

The one rifle I own would probably cause suspicion, especially if I had ammunition for it. It is a sniper rifle, albeit an old one. If they saw the targets in the back, they'd know I don't miss.

 

Quote: 
 
and you do a rolling stop.


Can't afford that. I drive for an occupation.


Quote: 
 
In the nearly 30 years of living in CA, they average 1500 new state laws per year,



I don't live in Cali, friend. I wouldn't live in California, way too liberal for my tastes. Pelosi is out there. OUT THERE. I'd suggest you move. Tomorrow, or sooner.

From: ANT_THOMAS 3 Feb 2016 09:23
To: fixrman 169 of 177
Too liberal in what sense?
From: fixrman 4 Feb 2016 03:45
To: ANT_THOMAS 170 of 177
Come on, man. California.
From: ANT_THOMAS 4 Feb 2016 08:05
To: fixrman 171 of 177
Come on, man. Explain.
From: fixrman 9 Feb 2016 03:40
To: ANT_THOMAS 172 of 177
It's California. What else is there to explain? CA is like cereal: Out there, what ain't fruits and nuts is flakes.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 9 Feb 2016 19:10
To: fixrman 173 of 177
Sugar Puffs, Coco Pops, Lucky Charms, Start.
From: Manthorp10 Feb 2016 01:47
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 174 of 177
I blame the fucking crumpets.
From: fixrman10 Feb 2016 03:53
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 175 of 177
They're terrible for you.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 Feb 2016 22:03
To: fixrman 176 of 177
You're terrible for you.
From: fixrman11 Feb 2016 03:58
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 177 of 177
 (fail)