1–1011–13

javascript-me-do

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)31 Oct 2012 19:00
To: Matt 7 of 13
40032.7 In reply to 40032.6
Now see, that would have taken me a week to figger out. It /just/ works!

Thanks!
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)31 Oct 2012 21:36
To: Matt 8 of 13
40032.8 In reply to 40032.6
It's bleeding obvious when you put purity and beauty of code aside and get down in the shit, innit?
Reply
0/0
From: Matt31 Oct 2012 21:47
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 9 of 13
40032.9 In reply to 40032.8
I was going to suggest using jQuery and show how to do the same, but I only had a few minutes to spare on my break, so that'll do :Y
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)31 Oct 2012 22:06
To: Matt 10 of 13
40032.10 In reply to 40032.9
One day I will look at jQuery. Possibly.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)31 Oct 2012 23:14
To: Matt 11 of 13
40032.11 In reply to 40032.9
I'm actually using jquery on that page anyway just for the select by class function.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)31 Oct 2012 23:18
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 12 of 13
40032.12 In reply to 40032.11
If the 'select by class function' simply selects elements based on CSS class, that could easily be hand-rolled with DOM scripting. If it refers to programming classes, then I'm done :(
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 1 Nov 2012 00:19
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 13 of 13
40032.13 In reply to 40032.12
I never had much luck getting it to work across browsers consistently whereas the jquery function seems to be fairly bulletproof.
Reply
0/0