Timelapse-me-do

From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)11 Jun 2012 18:22
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 47 of 81
The sun? What's that?
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)11 Jun 2012 18:23
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 48 of 81
:) Isn't he the male type person your wife gives you?
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)11 Jun 2012 18:24
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 49 of 81
Wife? What is that?
From: ANT_THOMAS11 Jun 2012 19:06
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 50 of 81
Dreary? That was a decent day.

Here's a day-light drive. It seems a frame every 2 seconds is reasonable in the motorway.

From: Matt11 Jun 2012 20:15
To: ALL51 of 81
I did these a couple of weeks ago, using Android ICS / Cyanogenmod stock camera with 1fps timelapse. Need a longer distance to drive to make these better.



From: ANT_THOMAS11 Jun 2012 20:26
To: Matt 52 of 81

A few decent roads though!

 

I want to do something when I go on a roadtrip to Liege, Hockenheim, Amsterdam, Brugge and Lille this summer.

 

Just need to find a suitable in car charger/power supply and do some maths to make sure my 16GB card is big enough.

 

1fps looks good, but I fear it'd give me too many photos and be too long for a really long trip. Though I have been using a lower resolution (but bigger than 1920x1080 to allow for enough cropping)

From: af (CAER)11 Jun 2012 20:41
To: ANT_THOMAS 53 of 81
I was gonna say, you don't need much resolution for video - I think a 4GB card holds like 4000 frames at just-over-full-HD res.
From: Matt11 Jun 2012 20:48
To: ANT_THOMAS 54 of 81
Android ICS / Cyanogenmod (I have no idea if it's a stock feature) records directly to MP4, so no manual stitching of JPEG images here :Y

1fps at 1080p (actually seems to be 1920x1088 which is a quirk of HTC camera apparently) created a 77MB video file, which I thought was rather good.

I'm off to Northampton on Saturday which should take me about an hour from here. That should create a ~300MB MP4 by my calculation.
From: Killamarshian (HAL9001)11 Jun 2012 23:32
To: ANT_THOMAS 55 of 81
The top one I did last week, the botom one quite a while back.



From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)12 Jun 2012 08:16
To: Killamarshian (HAL9001) 56 of 81
8 Miles in 4 Minutes took longer than 4 minutes. Should I feel gypped, or thrilled that I got more than I bargained for?

And was that really timelapse or sped-up video? Only there were times where movement was jittery, which I wouldn't expect from timelapse.
From: Killamarshian (HAL9001)14 Jun 2012 07:34
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 57 of 81
I mentioned in my first post that they are video speeded (sped?) up. There is some realy good stuff in this thread now. I love it.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)14 Jun 2012 07:52
To: Killamarshian (HAL9001) 58 of 81
So you did, but that was a month and a half ago and my memory isn't that good.
From: ANT_THOMAS29 Jul 2012 10:52
To: ALL59 of 81

Who would like to watch a timelapse of a european roadtrip (eurotrip :@ ) once I've put it all together?

 

Over 61000 photos. One every 2 seconds. Probably over 40mins long :|

From: koswix29 Jul 2012 12:27
To: ANT_THOMAS 60 of 81
Me. But make it shorter/faster.
From: ANT_THOMAS29 Jul 2012 12:57
To: koswix 61 of 81
Yeah, it's definitely too long, but not sure how to do it otherwise. 2 photos a second is essential. I could maybe double it to 48fps, but it could end up far too fast.
From: koswix29 Jul 2012 19:35
To: ANT_THOMAS 62 of 81
Do a few samples and see what looks good. Otherwise, slit it into multiple videos.between certain landmarks or whatever.
From: ANT_THOMAS29 Jul 2012 19:57
To: koswix 63 of 81

I've already generated each section as separate videos (actually watching them now on my TV). I was going to split them if my YouTube limit was 15mins but I can upload unlimited length.

 

I'm tempted to put up a Part1,2,3 etc version up and the full length.

 

Needs a backing track of some sort too. And all editing together with some text and other shiz.

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)29 Jul 2012 20:14
To: ANT_THOMAS 64 of 81
Did something interesting happen for every bit of the 33 hours you were recording for?

Or is this video going to contain 39 minutes of road?
From: ANT_THOMAS29 Jul 2012 20:23
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 65 of 81

It'd be pointless if I just faded it in and out of slightly interesting bits.

 

The fact is it's a fucking massive timelapse and unless I show it all it's a waste.

 

(and yes, pretty much all road)

EDITED: 29 Jul 2012 20:23 by ANT_THOMAS
From: ANT_THOMAS29 Mar 2013 00:27
To: ALL66 of 81
Well I finally finished it.....