Positive discrimination is still discrimination and is wrong. Although it's also illegal.
You seem to miss the part where you live in a society that is so skewed towards men that 38 years after the passing of the Equal Pay Act in 1970 we still have a gender pay gap of 17.2% (mean), raising to 35.6% among part time workers, or if you look at individual industries it's over 40% in Financial Services.
Almost all positions of power are held by white men in our society - there are only 2 black female MPs in Westminster, so the notion that this 'positive discrimination' shit is happening a lot isn't really backed up by the reality.(I admit it happens in some places, but I don't agree with it)
It made me REALLY ANGRY when I heard someone on Woman's Hour the other day asking a black woman whether black women should vote based on race or gender. Vote on policies, fools!
While I'm pretty suspicious about Barack's motives and backing, he seems to be the least warmongering candidate, so I'd have to go for him.
He stands /as/ the only opposition to Clinton. That may be more important than what he stands /for/.
Other than that, I did hear/read some good stuff about foreign policy and other stuff, which sounded nice. But it was all too dull to remember. Nice, but dull.
well, on a 1-10 scale, where 10 is good, i rate them this way:
Obama - 8: a little unknown, but policies leagues above anyone else
Mcain - 1: yes, he's a warmongering Bush clone, but still loads better than Hillary
Hillary - -8: Simply amazing, the only candidate in recent memory worse than bush... i dislike republicans greatly, but given the choice, i'd vote McCain over her.
Now don't get me wrong, this isn't a sexism thing... just look at her old record / hate campaign against Obama and especially her "think of the children!¬" pointless censorship attempts
It's all pretty pointless anyway, i'm 99% sure America will choose one of the two worst candidates and relagate itself to another 4-8years of bush-like rule :-((
Is it cause he is black?
<gets goat wearing a coat>
To me he is a bit like David Cameron. Young, enthusiastic and wants to change his country. Does he really have any proper policies or ideas that can make America a better nation? He has a lot of work to do reversing the damage done by the bush team (as does Cameron from the Labour tax mongers) but he has got to be better than the other two fossils that are contending with him.