Aye, I agree with that. I don't think you can have war without this stuff. It's war that's wrong, this is just a symptom of that wrongess. Doesn't excuse it, of course, and they should be prosecuted as far as possible and that. But ... no surprise.
Aren't USians still exempt from war crimes charges?
something that has crossed my mind a few times now :
why is it ok for Bush and Blair to make decisions and orders that result in the deaths of many innocents but when Saddam says (in court) "as leader of my country I have to make difficult decisions and sometimes people get hurt" they vilefy him ?
note: I am not in any way condoning any of Saddam's behaviour, I am merly pointing out that Bush and Blair seem to be going down the same road, just not as far (yet).
Not really. For every girl Saddam's sons raped before, there seems to be villages being raped at the moment.
And I'm not really exaggerating - one village saw something like 100-200 teenage (and single) girls give birth at similar times.
Not to mention the threats and beatings.
Yeah, now that an unbelievable amount of evidence against them is mounting day by day, they have nowhere else to go by whine about being sorry.
Fuckers.
They're both in the happy position of being immensely wealthy, which must make feeling sorry a whole lot easier.
Wealth or not, what they crave more than anything is that posterity will judge them heroes. So I curse them both with long enough retirements that they come to recognise in their declining years that history will regard them as evil, murdering and imcompetent shits.