Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–16
The Lights Are On!
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
14 Aug 2012 16:37
To: Dan (HERMAND)
13 of 16
39806.13
In reply to
39806.12
Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning?
So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm?
From: ANT_THOMAS
14 Aug 2012 16:46
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
14 of 16
39806.14
In reply to
39806.13
quote:
Peter (BOUGHTONP)
Would that really be a sackable offence? As opposed to just a warning?
So long as he's not actively avoiding work (i.e. only using it during breaks/downtime), which I presume is the case anyway, it's not really doing any harm?
Ahahahahahahaha
From: patch
14 Aug 2012 17:40
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
15 of 16
39806.15
In reply to
39806.13
There'd be wording along the lines of " actively circumventing the prescribed security procedures" involved.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
14 Aug 2012 18:31
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
16 of 16
39806.16
In reply to
39806.12
Exactly. Like patch says, actively circumventing security.