Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–17
Embedding YouTube
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
18 Jul 2012 13:23
To: ANT_THOMAS
4 of 17
39725.4
In reply to
39725.2
quote:
Rather not use the iframe.
Why the fuck not?
quote:
I didn't have flash installed
youtube.com/html5
Wasn't perfect last time I checked, but it's improving.
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
18 Jul 2012 13:24
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)
5 of 17
39725.5
In reply to
39725.3
Is there a emote that would represent retardedness?
From: ANT_THOMAS
18 Jul 2012 13:25
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
6 of 17
39725.6
In reply to
39725.4
No sensible reason.
The iframe way looks no different and is less lines of code so I might use it.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
18 Jul 2012 13:26
To: ANT_THOMAS
7 of 17
39725.7
In reply to
39725.6
It's exactly the situation when an iframe makes sense / is intended to be used.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
18 Jul 2012 13:27
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
8 of 17
39725.8
In reply to
39725.5
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
18 Jul 2012 13:27
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
9 of 17
39725.9
In reply to
39725.5
Sorry, I had to!
(hug)
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
18 Jul 2012 13:29
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
10 of 17
39725.10
In reply to
39725.9
:-O
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)
18 Jul 2012 13:31
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
11 of 17
39725.11
In reply to
39725.4
S'pretty much perfect now. (html5 youtube, that is)
From: ANT_THOMAS
18 Jul 2012 13:39
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
12 of 17
39725.12
In reply to
39725.7
And with there being far less code it is much easier to have that part linked to a database too.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
18 Jul 2012 13:45
To: ANT_THOMAS
13 of 17
39725.13
In reply to
39725.12
Yep.
Although I still say you probably want auto-discovery and a few minimal config files.
:P