Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–17
MySQL sadness
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
24 Mar 2011 14:45
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
14 of 17
38315.14
In reply to
38315.13
t3.Tag can't be two things at once.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
24 Mar 2011 15:13
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
15 of 17
38315.15
In reply to
38315.14
Maybe the 'AND' should be 'OR'
<shrug>
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
24 Mar 2011 15:20
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
16 of 17
38315.16
In reply to
38315.15
And then he'd need the group by/having again, to restrict it to items with both.
From: steve
24 Mar 2011 20:07
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
17 of 17
38315.17
In reply to
38315.13
I realised it'd be
better
to have the tags work like that, but like I said - it's a very small-scale script and there are benefits to doing it this way (when the last image tagged as something has it's tag removed, that option vanishes altogether.etc).