Website advice

From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)16 Mar 2011 20:57
To: PNCOOL 17 of 73
Which leg was it that you broke recently?
From: af (CAER)16 Mar 2011 23:59
To: steve 18 of 73
It could do with a "Best viewed in Internet Explorer 4 at 800x600 resolution" thing, too, I reckon. And possibly a "Made with Dreamweaver" banner.
From: Lucy (X3N0PH0N)17 Mar 2011 00:19
To: af (CAER) 19 of 73
*Made with MS FrontPage.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)17 Mar 2011 00:26
To: Lucy (X3N0PH0N) 20 of 73
*Made with HotMetal Pro.
From: steve17 Mar 2011 00:39
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 21 of 73
*MS Frontpage express

:C
From: steve17 Mar 2011 00:40
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 22 of 73
Or even worse...

http://www.wdvl.com/Reviews/HTML/SiteScribbler/

Gunsoft SiteScribbler v2

When I used to churn out freeware software aged 14 (giggle)
From: steve17 Mar 2011 00:41
To: steve 23 of 73
You'll notice that I preempted Microsoft's ribbon menus by a good few years :Y
From: af (CAER)17 Mar 2011 10:39
To: steve 24 of 73
I like the purple gradient on the TABLE WIZARD dialog :D
From: PNCOOL18 Mar 2011 17:50
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 25 of 73
Haha, the right one... and my page counter says I've broken it precisely 00001 times :-Y
From: Aurora18 Mar 2011 22:32
To: ALL26 of 73

Forget DreamWeaver and go with WordPress so that the site can be maintained by the client.  Unless you wish to be bothered without payment by your relative you can offload maintenance and changes to the client with WordPress.

From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)19 Mar 2011 01:19
To: Aurora 27 of 73

Or joomla (haven't tried wordpress).

 

I dunno. For a 'flat' site that is unlikely to be updated very often, a cms could be overkill by a factor of 10,000.

 

"bothered without payment" this is the key, isn't it?

 

Somehow, the non-paying relative's priorities are always eclipsed by more rewarding pastimes, like watching tv in your underwear...

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)19 Mar 2011 01:29
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 28 of 73
Why have you got Aurora's underwear?
From: Mouse19 Mar 2011 09:39
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 29 of 73
:D
From: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX)20 Mar 2011 23:15
To: ALL30 of 73

Well that was a week from hell! Started treatment on Monday for my kidney disease (Steroids for 1 month, then Chemo drugs for 1 month, rinse and repeat for 6 months, which is nice) The steroid treatment has buggered up my blood levels so ended up in hospital from Monday to Friday at various times of the day.
Oh and I seem to be getting roid rage, especially when driving and at work, its like being on coke but without the happy buzz, really, really horrible.

 

Anyway, I managed to sit down for a few hours tonight to start this bloody site (wish I said no now)

 

http://www.beautyattiffanys.com/wip

 

Be gentle, its not like I am at all skilled in anyway at this sort of thing. The site template is ripped from a pre made and bashed around a lot by me, I even created new images for the title and back ground (Can you tell?) The site needs nothing whizzy, just the basic info about the salon so I think I have created a good looking simple design to work with. And no animated GIFS anywhere!

 

I still don't know how I want to display the price list but I want something easily editable for quick updating.

 

So tips and advice please teh!

EDITED: 20 Mar 2011 23:21 by SLAYERPUNX
From: Matt20 Mar 2011 23:46
To: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 31 of 73
{{Wattsy}}

Looks good and the images are working here. Few tweaks and I think you'll have a decent enough website knocked together in double quick time.

One thing that might work better is to move the menu. At the moment it looks a bit disconnected from the rest of the site. It would possibly be better as part of the main header, but below the Beauty at Tiffany's text.

Speaking of the the Beauty at Tiffanys text, make it an actual image and choose a decent font. If they already have a designed logo for the business, say on business cards, shop frontage, use that. If they don't have a logo yet, make one and get them to reuse it on their business cards, etc.

You'd probably want to make the contact information (phone number at very least) more obvious too. Stick that at the top of the page, where the menu is now, but reduce the margin so it only just sites above the header.

Other than that, you should really resize / crop the images in the slideshow. At the moment you're serving up various sized images and squeezing them into a 200x200px element, which makes them look wonky. Get your photo manipulating software of choice out and resize them. If the photos are used elsewhere on the site, keep separate copies for the slideshow.

I hope you get better soon. If you need any help with the site, just shout, mkay?
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)21 Mar 2011 00:23
To: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 32 of 73
I was expecting worse. Especially after you saying you're an angry drugged-up psycho. :P

(That's a compliment; don't attack me!)

Anyway, some suggestions/etc.

Bigger text. 11px is too small for normal body text.

Opening Hours - be good to align the times instead of having them wiggling.
(It's ok to use a two-column headerless table for this, although a dl might be best fit.)

The contact us link at the bottom has Inquiry spelt wrong.
(Also, personally I prefer a "Contact" page that summarises the different methods instead of a direct email link - dunno how others feel about that.)

The copyright text is grey on darker grey. Since it doesn't actually serve any legal purpose (the content is automatically copyrighted, such a notice is simply a polite reminder) if you don't want it there you can remove it entirely; but otherwise make it more readable.

Treatment and Price list links don't work?

On the "About us" page, the "What we can offer" section seems like it would belong on Treatment page?

The way the text wraps means it says "surgical facelift to rewind the years" underneath the picture of Maggie, which is possibly insulting? (Drop the line-height to 200% and it avoids that, along with making the text more readable. Also didn't Caer suggest an optimal line-height in another thread recently... was 1.5 (150%) if I'm not remembering wrong.)


Did someone mentions CMSs before? You could definitely convert what you've got to a CMS template, and basically give them an area where they can edit the price list themselves.
It'd mean a bit more effort now, but may means less effort in future (particularly if you don't want them bugging about changing pricelists on a regular basis), so depends how you feel about it.
(But if you do go that route, don't use WordPress because it's crap and insecure.)

Oooh, the server says it's running Apache 1.3.29 ? That's relatively old now (7.5 years), so you probably want to upgrade to 1.3.42 to make sure any security holes are fixed. (The latest version is 2.2, but I don't know if there's any specific benefit for such a simple site; the 1.3.x stream still has security issues patched.)


Oh, one more minor thing - worth considering a one pixel border around the images (not the slideshow ones, the other ones) - helps the light edges stand out from the white background.

And now being really picky - the staff photo - crop the right hand side off. It serves no purpose and the bright white form thing is (photographically) offensive. :P


Ok, I'm done now. Hopefully that was mostly constructive. :)
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)21 Mar 2011 01:22
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 33 of 73

>It'd mean a bit more effort now, but may means less effort in future

 

No, it means you'll spend more time training them how to use the cms to make said updates without fucking up the whole site than you would need to spend on ten years of manual updates and trying on aurora's underwear.

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)21 Mar 2011 01:34
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 34 of 73
Maybe.

Depends on the person.
From: ANT_THOMAS21 Mar 2011 10:12
To: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 35 of 73

Peeb has summed up what I was going to say.

 

Opening times should be lined up, and make the text on the About Us page not just go under the photo with half a line. If there was more text it wouldn't look as bad, or make it a single column, or increase the text size so more ends up underneath so it looks like it's wrapping around the photo properly.

From: patch21 Mar 2011 10:45
To: Wattsy (SLAYERPUNX) 36 of 73
Has the spell-check been done yet? It needs one. Other than that, though, what the others have said.